Scotland’s review of NHS targets
Getting the elective targets right is important. But balancing activity against demand matters more.
Filter blog posts
You can filter out our blog posts below by a category relevant to yourself.
Getting the elective targets right is important. But balancing activity against demand matters more.
It's a recurring problem, and it needs a recurring solution. But all that's on offer is short-term fixes.
How many patients are expected to breach the target every week? It's a good question. To answer it, you need to understand how patients are being scheduled.
The English waiting list grew more rapidly than expected in April, and it is now unlikely that the 18 week target will ever be achieved again. Unless there is a massive recurring and non-recurring effort, that is.
We are launching better analyses of your local 18 weeks pressures, to take advantage of new data, improve the analysis of medical specialties, and allow easier comparison with your previous month's waiting list.
(First published in Roy Lilley’s nhsManagers newsletter) The English NHS breached the 18-week waiting times target in March, but the bald statistics just don’t give a sense of how bad... Read more
England might breach the 18 week waiting times target again in April. After that, it might be gone for good.
It was another bad month for England's 18 week waiting times - the worst performance since the "incomplete pathways" target was introduced in 2012, powered by the largest waiting list since January 2008.
Most performance reports tell you what happened, but not whether it was enough. That's a pretty big omission, and the only way to fix it is to have a plan and track your progress against it. What does that look like? And how do you actually do it?
How late is a "late start" in your operating theatres? If I told you they probably cost something like £20 a minute, how late is a "late start" now?